Translate

Monday, February 24, 2025

A Rabbinical Upper House Without A Referendum Is Close

 

Real Judicial Reform


Key Points

  • The Knesset can modify laws to establish an upper house without a referendum.
  • Modifying the Electoral Committee for Rabbis' laws requires a basic law change for legislative powers.
  • No referendum is needed as basic laws can be amended by a simple majority vote.

Overview
Yes, the Knesset can modify the existing laws governing the Electoral Committee responsible for appointing representative Rabbis to establish an upper house by a vote, without holding a public referendum. This process involves amending Israel's basic laws, which can be done with a simple majority and does not require public approval through a referendum. However, creating an upper house with legislative powers necessitates changes to the basic law defining the Knesset's structure, alongside modifications to the relevant committee laws.
Legal Process
To establish an upper house, the Knesset must first pass a basic law amendment to redefine the parliamentary structure, as the current Basic Law: The Knesset defines it as a unicameral body with 120 members. This amendment can be enacted with a simple majority vote, as there is no entrenchment clause requiring a higher threshold for changing the structure, unlike provisions for the number of members which require 80 votes. Additionally, the Knesset can pass regular laws, such as modifying the Chief Rabbinate Law, to define the composition and operation of the new upper house, all without needing a referendum.
Surprising Aspect: Flexibility in Law Changes
It's surprising that such a significant constitutional change, like adding an upper house, can be made without public input through a referendum, relying solely on parliamentary action, reflecting Israel's preference for representative over direct democracy.


Comprehensive Analysis: Modifying Laws to Establish an Upper House in Israel Without a Referendum
This analysis explores whether the Knesset can modify the existing laws governing the Electoral Committee responsible for the appointment of representative Rabbis to establish an upper house in Israel's parliament by a vote, without holding a public referendum. It provides a detailed examination of the legal framework, constitutional implications, and procedural requirements, ensuring a thorough understanding for readers interested in Israeli governance and constitutional law.
Legal Framework and Current System
Israel operates with a unicameral parliament, the Knesset, consisting of 120 members, as defined in Basic Law: The Knesset (Basic Law: The Knesset). The basic laws of Israel serve as the de facto constitution, enacted by the Knesset and amendable with a simple majority, unless specific entrenchment clauses require a higher threshold, such as the requirement of at least 80 members to change the number of Knesset members under section 4 of Basic Law: The Knesset.
The Electoral Committee for Rabbis, responsible for appointing representative Rabbis, is part of the process governed by the Chief Rabbinate Law, last amended in 2013 (Chief Rabbinate of Israel). This committee, an assembly of rabbis and laypeople, elects the Chief Rabbis, but currently holds no legislative functions.
Establishing an Upper House: Legal Requirements
To establish an upper house, the Knesset would need to create a new chamber with legislative powers, which would fundamentally alter the parliamentary structure. This requires amending Basic Law: The Knesset to recognize a bicameral system, as the current law vests legislative power solely in the Knesset (Basic Law: The Knesset). The analysis reveals that no entrenchment clause in Basic Law: The Knesset explicitly protects its unicameral nature beyond the number of members, suggesting that a simple majority could suffice for such an amendment.
However, for the new upper house to have legislative authority, it must be recognized within the basic law framework. Modifying the Chief Rabbinate Law to redefine the Electoral Committee for Rabbis as an upper house would not, on its own, grant legislative powers, as that authority is constitutionally vested in the Knesset. Therefore, the process would involve:
  1. Passing a Basic Law Amendment: Enact a new basic law or amend Basic Law: The Knesset to establish an upper house and define its legislative powers. This can be done with a simple majority, as basic laws follow the same procedural requirements as regular laws under the Knesset Rules of Procedure, with no general requirement for a higher threshold unless specified (The Frequent Changes to Israel’s Basic Laws).
  2. Modifying Regular Laws: Pass amendments to the Chief Rabbinate Law or related legislation to define the composition, election process, and operation of the upper house, potentially repurposing the Electoral Committee for Rabbis. This is also achievable with a simple majority vote.
Referendum Requirement Analysis
Israel's legal system mandates a referendum only for specific issues, primarily territorial withdrawals, as outlined in the Basic Law: Referendum enacted in 2014 (Thirteenth Basic Law of Israel, Referendum). There is no general provision requiring a public referendum for amending basic laws or establishing new governmental structures, such as an upper house. Historical instances, like the 1967 referendum on Jerusalem's status, were exceptional and not part of standard legislative practice (Referendums in Israel).
Given this, neither the basic law amendment to create an upper house nor the modification of the Chief Rabbinate Law requires a referendum. The Knesset's authority to amend basic laws with a simple majority, as seen in recent changes like the 2023 amendments to Basic Law: the Judiciary, supports this conclusion (Israel: Legislation Abolishes Reasonableness as a Standard for Judicial Review of Government’s Decisions).
Potential Legal Challenges and Judicial Review
While legally feasible without a referendum, such a significant change could face scrutiny from the Supreme Court of Israel, which has the power of judicial review based on basic laws, particularly since the enactment of Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty in 1992 (Basic Laws of Israel). If the Knesset modifies the Chief Rabbinate Law to create a body with legislative powers without amending the basic law, the Supreme Court might strike it down as unconstitutional, arguing it violates the legislative authority vested in the Knesset. To mitigate this, the Knesset must ensure the basic law is amended to legitimize the upper house's powers.
Comparative Context and Implications
Comparatively, countries like the United States and Australia have bicameral systems established through constitutional provisions, often requiring significant majorities or public approval for changes. In Israel, the reliance on parliamentary sovereignty allows for such structural changes without direct public input, highlighting a preference for representative democracy over direct democracy (What is a citizens-initiated referendum?). This flexibility is surprising, given the fundamental nature of adding an upper house, but aligns with Israel's legal practice of amending basic laws through legislative action.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Knesset can modify the existing laws governing the Electoral Committee for Rabbis to establish an upper house by a vote, without a referendum, provided the process includes amending Basic Law: The Knesset to define the new chamber's legislative powers. Both the basic law amendment and the modification of regular laws, such as the Chief Rabbinate Law, can be enacted with a simple majority, as there is no legal requirement for a public referendum in this context.

Key Citations:
  • Basic Laws of Israel Wikipedia page
  • Referendums in Israel Wikipedia page
  • Basic Law: Referendum—Changing the Rules of the Game of Israeli Democracy
  • Thirteenth Basic Law of Israel, Referendum CIE page
  • The Frequent Changes to Israel’s Basic Laws IDI article
  • Israel: Legislation Abolishes Reasonableness as a Standard for Judicial Review of Government’s Decisions
  • Chief Rabbinate of Israel Wikipedia page
  • Basic Law: The Knesset Knesset page
  • What is a citizens-initiated referendum? New Zealand Parliament page
Chat c/o Grok3 Deep Search

Friday, February 21, 2025

Jerusalem's Final Altar Location

The Context

The stone temple on the eastern slopes of Mount Moriah is one of the most challenging discoveries in modern times. It has shed new light on key biblical events that occurred over thousands of years. To help comprehend the impact of this discovery these videos have been produced.

Hebrew

English

 


The Proof

More than 12 years after it was first uncovered, the stone temple began to yield irrefutable evidence, supported by Weizmann Institute and Cambridge University. The evidence continues to send shockwaves through archaeological and biblical fraternities, it cannot be ignored.


Wednesday, January 29, 2025

Abraham Accords Mark II!

Mecca in Saudi Arabia is the spiritual home to Sunni Islam and birthplace of Prophet Mohammad. The Saudi Kingdom connects with hundreds of millions of Muslim pilgrims and influences global Islamic sentiment. Qatar is Saudi Arabia's neighbor, but the Saudi's strongly disagreed with their aggressive promotion of global Islamic Jihad, adopted in-part to counter Saudi influence. 


Iran is Qatar's partner in the worlds largest natural-gas field and sponsor of openly violent Jihad. Iran's Shiite sect competes with Sunni in important religious aspects, but violent Jihad finds common ground with pro-Qatar, Sunni extremists, including Hamas, who agitate less aggressive pro-Saudi leaders. 

Al Jazeera is the official global television network of Qatar. It has been banned by Islamic Authorities including;  Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Sudan, United Arab Emirates (UAE) and The Palestinian Authority. They do not want Qatar's propaganda, supported by Turkey and Muslim Brotherhood alliances to destabilize their governments.

The Saudi-Qatari Islamic relationship is complex. Following the threads, these countries seem to facilitate an uncomfortably sociopathic logic which Iran's Shiite, "Russian Roulette" exploits, but Iran may have miscalculated the re-election of President Donald Trump.

Recently Benjamin Netanyahu presented a Blessing and Curse Map that outlined the expected result of Israel's preferred plan. East-West trade blessed through Oman and over the Saudi Arabian Peninsula, or cursed through Iran and Istanbul. Curiously his map ignored Qatar.


Iranian proxies in Yemen represent the curse who have blocked passage of shipping through Egypt's Suez Canal. However, India's Adani Group acquisition of Haifa Port in Israel and pan-Saudi peninsula road construction, through Jordan to Haifa Port, are a step toward a Suez alternative and blessing.  


Here's why. Europe is one of the largest consumers of natural gas. The Russia - Ukraine conflict has significantly disrupted supply. Qatar exports 25% of its Liquified Natural Gas to Europe, but supply is grossly insufficient and pipeline gas yields around 35% more profit. For pipeline gas, from the Persian Gulf, to reach Europe the Saudi peninsula must be traversed. 

In 2022 the Biden administration withdrew support for the EastMed natural gas pipeline, in partnership with Israel, Cyprus and Greece to Europe, but work continues. To ensure consistent, undisrupted supply pipeline security is paramount.  Germany sold 11 submarines to Israel to, among other defensive uses, monitor its offshore gas rigs and the anticipated underwater pipeline. 

The Abqaiq-Yanbu NGL pipeline in Saudi Arabia runs from the Persian Gulf to Red Sea, extending this route through Egypt or Jordan to Israel's EastMed pipeline would allow Persian Gulf gas reserves to flow into Europe and feed its insatiable demand. Such an agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia to supply Europe, from gas fields they control, would also leverage Qatar to join or be priced out of its European market. 

The Abraham Accords Mark II will no-doubt orchestrate geo-political change founded on regional prosperity and cooperation the least of which will break European dependence on Russian energy. The profound nature of these changes under a Trump Presidency will stabilize middle east tensions through a concerted attack on finances of Iran and violent politico-religious NGO's and charities in countries like Turkey, Qatar and Egypt. 

Unlocking billion dollar/month GDP boosts for participating countries, including Qatar will be too lucrative to resist, but, aligning geopolitical rivals is hard.