Israel's indigenous record through the lens of Jerusalem, archaeology or emerging events. BS'D
Translate
Thursday, October 10, 2024
This Discovery Will Eventually Change The World!
Open water drain or channel
Organic fragments in drain
On the eastern slopes of Mount Moriah, within the City of David, archaeologists have uncovered a significant Middle Bronze Age water system. This system includes remnants of a reservoir and a rock-hewn channel that once conveyed water to two of four chambers carved into the bedrock. These rooms form part of an ancient rock-cut temple, situated 35 meters above the Gihon Spring.
Carbon dating of organic samples, carried out by Cambridge University and the Weizmann Institute, placed the construction and final use of the water channel around 1535 BCE. The samples were taken from near the plaster remains of an open drain, which ran from the elevated reservoir, along the bedrock slope, and into the rooms below. This drain system reveals that water once flowed through the channel more than 3,500 years ago, as confirmed by the landscape mapped by the Israel Antiquities Authority.
The most revealing samples, found directly beneath and just above the plastered drain, align precisely with the traditional biblical chronology of the final 30 years Jacob lived in Canaan before relocating with his family to Egypt. This dating suggests the water system of this ancient temple was built and exclusively used during this narrow period. Once Jacob departed, the temple complex was left deserted, eventually buried under sand and debris from the steep terrain and never rediscovered by the mountains subsequent occupants.
Functionally, the water system was designed to cleanse blood and waste from two adjoining rooms—one used for slaughtering and processing animals, and the other for offering sacrifices on an altar made of stones. Between them lies a chamber with a standing stone, or matzevah. Given the channel’s dating, this standing stone can be confidently associated with the one Jacob erected at Beth El, after his divine encounter at Mount Moriah, when he received the name Israel (Genesis 35:7–15).
Count the fused stones on the front?
Compare the view from the back!
Senior archaeologist Ronny Reich, in his book Excavations in the City of David, opens with a chapter titled "A Moment in Which to Be Born." There, he notes that the spring east of the city—beneath the rock-cut temple—was never called Gihon in the Bible, but En Shemesh (Sun Spring). The spring is characterized as a seasonal gusher, intermittently surging like a pump—fitting the Hebrew word gihon, meaning “bursting forth.” However, each morning, to this day, sunlight, (shemesh in Hebrew) illuminates the entrance to the spring.
Reich used this En Shemesh identification to resolve a longstanding difficulty in interpreting a boundary passage in the Book of Joshua. That passage describes a point where the tribal borders of Judah and Benjamin converge—precisely where, by design, the altar’s raised bedrock foundation sits. This location supports Reich's identification and reinforces the site's significance.
Note the South East corner of the altar foundation
Importantly, the southeastern corner of the altars' foundation marks a location that complies not only with Reich’s En Shemesh boundary but also with traditional Jewish law. This stands in contrast to the First and Second Temple altars, which were situated further up the mountain—on today’s Temple Mount. Those higher placements do not align with either the En Shemesh boundary or the location of the ancient spring.
Furthermore, the altar’s westward orientation matches the description in Maimonides' Guide for the Perplexed (Part 3, Chapter 45 page 355), which asserts that while the ancient world worshipped facing east (toward the sun), Abraham, on Mount Moriah, turned west—toward the future Sanctuary—his back to the sun.
This altar foundation, composed of native bedrock, would have supported temporary assemblies of stones during sacrifices. This matches the description in Genesis 35:7, where Jacob names the place El-Bethel, commemorating God’s earlier revelation to him at that spot, during his flight from Esau—22 years prior—when he had the dream of the stairway to heaven and erected a matzevah.
How then, can we reconcile this matzevah, altar and water system—dated to Jacob’s time—with the later First Temple altar built by Solomon on the summit of Mount Moriah? The answer lies in David’s sin and repentance. According to 1 Chronicles 21:17 (and 2 Samuel 24), David, after his census error, was instructed by the prophet Gad to ascend Mount Moriah’s summit and erect an altar. David purchased the land from the Jebusite king—who had controlled the upper slopes of the mountain—and the summit eventually became the site of the Temple Mount. Unlike Jacob’s site, David’s altar was initially chosen to atone for David's specific transgression.
The newly discovered altar and its associated temple, located lower on the eastern slope—above En Shemesh—thus appear to be the original site associated with Jacob, Isaac, Abraham, and perhaps even the priest-king Melchizedek. These overlapping but distinct sacred sites pose deep theological and historical questions.
Today, the location of the ancient temple remains at the heart of Israel’s struggles. Militant Islamic groups often depict the Temple Mount—home to the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque—in their imagery. Tradition holds that this mountaintop is where Abraham bound Isaac. Yet, with the discovery of this rock-cut temple—complete with altar foundation, Jacob’s matzevah, and west-facing orientation—perhaps it is time to reconsider the true site for Israel’s final temple: not the summit of Mount Moriah, but its eastern slope, where ancient topography, archaeology, and scripture converge.
I agree with your last paragraph completely. Well said. Things are falling into place, like this from Yuval Gadot: “The scale of this trench (dry moat which defends the City of David's northern side), which completely changes the natural topography, tells us that it’s time to go back to the biblical texts and reevaluate references to the old geography of the city.” His implied question, Why would they need such a defense from the area of the Temple Mount during the time of David and Solomon--when it was in use? https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359486839112
I agree with your last paragraph completely. Well said.
ReplyDeleteThings are falling into place, like this from Yuval Gadot:
“The scale of this trench (dry moat which defends the City of David's northern side), which completely changes the natural topography, tells us that it’s time to go back to the biblical texts and reevaluate references to the old geography of the city.”
His implied question, Why would they need such a defense from the area of the Temple Mount during the time of David and Solomon--when it was in use?
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6359486839112
Love Biblical Archaeology👏👏👌👌🇮🇱🇮🇱
ReplyDelete