The Primordial Reality of Zion!

Abstract

Kabbalistic philosophy is not a later interpretation of Tanach; it is the supernal root and central vein from which the entire revealed Torah emerges. As affirmed across Lurianic, Chassidic, and Ramchal traditions, the sefirotic structure, covenants, and psycho-spiritual realities precede and animate the written text.

“Zion” is first and foremost the sefirah (attribute) of Yesod (Foundation), the precise psycho-spiritual locus where the inner covenant (periya) unites with outer Kingdom (Malchut/Jerusalem). Drawing directly on the Zohar, Sefer Yetzirah, Kedushat Levi, and the gematria of Tzion = Yosef = 156, the physical site of Zion, on the lower southern slope of Mount Moriah directly above the Gihon Spring (En Shemesh/En Rogel) must precisely converge. 

Joshua’s immutable tribal boundaries fix Benjamin’s lower Yesod connection, David’s conquest of the “stronghold of Zion”, the breaking of the “HaMakom” chain at the summit threshing floor, Isaiah 52:8’s unique grammar (“God will return Zion”), Maimonides’ insistence on altar precision, and the geo-physical requirements of aliya-la-regel together form an irrefutable multi-disciplinary proof. As psycho-spiritual and physical realities realign at the original Zion location, God will literally return Zion to its place, restoring the Shechinah in full Messianic revelation.

God's presence settles in the west,
therefore mirror image, so left swaps right.

1. Central Vein: Kabbalistic Philosophy as the Preceding and Eternal Foundation of All Tanach

Zohar teaches that Zion is the psycho-spiritual attribute of Foundation, the Yesod activated by separating the inner periya of Jewish circumcision from the outer orla representing Malchut, Kingdom, Jerusalem, then by folding them together they manifest Jewish covenantal reality. The Book of Creation, Sefer Yetzirah, relates these to the covenant of holy tongue, to language and its use of Hebrew’s holy letters, inspiring man to aspire to The Creators pure speech.

The Kedushat Levi explains that this type of “speaking” (speech) was expressed by Joseph The Righteous, Yosef Hatzadik refusal to “suckle” from impure sources (a reference to his struggle in Egypt). The Hebrew letters of Yosef and Tzion share the same numerical value or gematria ‘156’ both represent Yesod, the organ of Israel’s covenant which Yosef guarded and maintained in purity avoiding foreign, impure influences (both physical and spiritual).

The Lesson: Rav Levi Yitzchak teaches that the mouth, that is destined to “speak to the Shechinah” (Divine Presence) must be guarded against impurity, just as Yosef guarded himself in Egypt. By following the dietary laws first stated in Shemini, Jews sanctify their mouths to ensure they are worthy of connection to God, mirroring Yosef’s righteousness. Also, in Shemini, Nadav and Avihu died bringing a foreign fire into the Holy of Holies and later, from Balak the midrash and Zohar describe how their souls converged into a zealous Pinchas who was immediately and uniquely elevated to the Priesthood and ultimately reincarnated into The Prophet Eliyahu.

Every Passover Jews pour a cup of wine then walk it to their front doors where they call outside for Eliyahu’s return, which is thought to be the event that precedes Messianic return (Moshiach). The same Eliyahu is welcomed at every Jewish Circumcision, The Covenant, who comes to spiritually observe the separation of periya and orla of every brit milah (covenant of circumcision).

This perpetual Jewish ritual connecting covenant with speech, Zion with Joseph manifests in King David’s Messianic reality when Eliyahu returns to tell about the imminent realization of Moshiach in the world. This is the time that Zion will be fully revealed and the Shechina, representing God’s presence, restored as the prevailing and dominant feature of manifest reality.

Its because Kabbalistic science precedes and illuminates all of Tanach that the physical location of Zion cannot be separated from this inner architecture. The supernal Yesod demands exact convergence with Kingdom, its earthly counterpart.

2. Tribal Boundaries: Joshua’s Immutable Map of Kabbalistic Convergence

Jewish Law and Tradition establish Zion, the inner Foundation and Jerusalem, the outer Kingdom by absolute precision, fixed by Divine designation, tribal boundaries, and physical features that can be verified against text. They are in fact not only places reserved for the psycho-spiritual-realm, their convergence must also, both occupy the same place in the physical realm and when they do, “God will return Zion” to its place!

Joseph’s only brother Benjamin represents the lower aspect of Foundation, Yesod and that is precisely where the psycho-spiritual connection between Foundation and Kingdom manifests. It is on Benjamin's land that Joseph's upper Foundation was destined to connect to David's tribe of Judah land, that point of connection is Zion.

Joshua 15:7 (Benjamin's Eastern, Judash's Western Border):The boundary ascended from the Valley of Achor to Debir and turned north to Gilgal, facing the Ascent of Adummim that is south of the wadi; from there the boundary continued to the Waters of En-shemesh and ran on to En-rogel. Joshua 15:8 (Benjamin's Southern, Judah's Northern Border) “The boundary went up the Valley of the Son of Hinnom to the southern slope of the Jebusite city, that is Jerusalem and climbed to the crest of the mountain west of the Hinnom Valley at its northern end, at the Valley of Rephaim.” Joshua 18:16 (Judah's Northern, Benjamin’s Southern Border): “The border went down to the foot of the mountain that lies before the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, which is in the Valley of Rephaim on the north; it continued down the Valley of Hinnom to the slope of the Jebusite on the south, and descended to En Rogel.”

These verses place the boundary at the southern slope of Mount Moriah, the Jebusite city (Jerusalem), the Valley of Hinnom, and En Rogel to En Shemesh, the exact area of the Gihon Spring along the eastern slope of Mount Moriah. Later the Gemara explicitly adopted these Joshua boundaries, albeit to describe the second temple altar.

3. Davidic Conquest: The Stronghold as Temporary Substitute for Primordial Zion

Zion is mentioned first in 2 Samuel 5:7–9 which says: “David captured the stronghold of Zion and renamed it City of David…Whoever would strike the Jebusites, let him go up the water channel (TZiNoR).” The site is the “stronghold of Zion” captured via the water channel.

“Stronghold” could mean adjacent (nearby) or surrounding "of Zion", but close in proximity. So, we are left to ponder whether David ever located the physical Zion that the stronghold protected or what may have happened to it? When David captured the “stronghold of Zion”, the Jebusite village was a settlement on the upper ridge on the lower (southern) slope of Mount Moriah immediately above, in line with the spring of En Shemesh, first mentioned in Joshua 15:7 a few hundred years prior.

However, 2 Samuel 5:9 tells us the stronghold was renamed City of David, later 1 Kings 8:1 says the City of David is Zion and much later Isaiah 52:8 says God will return Zion.

King David had been anointed seven years prior to his arrival at the Stronghold, so what compelled him to come to this Mount Moriah location, conquer the stronghold and invoke the name Zion? As we have already discussed, the ancient psycho-spiritual-reality converging Zion and Jerusalem was already entrenched in indigenous tribal Israelite culture. The name Salem emanated at Abraham tithing Malchi-Tzedek, the High Priest of Salem and later at the binding of Isaac Abraham added the name Yireh to the same site together constituting Yireh-Salem: Jerusalem.

On David’s arrival at the mountain, his coining the word “Zion” declared it as the integral objective of his mission. But, the stronghold was a lesser substitute for a Zion that was not ready to be returned. Instead the City of David became its deflection. Once the first temple had been built Zion drifted from its anchor and its original location on Mount Moriah shifted from the place, by which Jerusalem had once obtained its name.

4. The Breaking of the Chain: “HaMakom,” the Akedah Altar, and the Summit Shift

Tanach reserved the definite article “HaMakom” (“The Place”) for the Moriah location, that permanently identified the Abrahamic event that established Yireh-Salem and the altar of Isaac’s binding - Akedah. But, almost 1000 years later, toward the end of his reign, King David made a surprise announcement: “This is the altar for the burnt-offerings of Israel”, it broke the chain and shifted Zion off the eastern ridge once designated as the "stronghold of Zion" to the mountain summit “of Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to David, at the place that David had appointed, on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.”

Walking up to the holy places of Mount Moriah, whether the eastern ridge or the summit threshing floor can only ever, geo-physically, occur by approaching from the south or east. In first and second temple Jerusalem the sense of psycho-spiritual rising up or elevation known as aliya-la-regel was preserved through the centuries by an approach from the South. Approaching from the east became the exclusive practise of the priests serving in these temples.

5. Prophetic Confirmation: Isaiah 52:8 as the Decisive Grammatical and Mystical Linchpin

The prophet Isaiah, Yeshayahu states: בשוב ה״ ציון (52:8) which literally means “God will return Zion”. Commentators debate comparative translations of similar verses, but all other grammar relating to Zions return include prefix or suffix letters that indicate God will return to Zion. However, here God will return Zion, which we can comprehend in the lofty psycho-spiritual realm, but we must also understand it in reality.

The prophet is not speaking metaphorically. He is announcing the imminent convergence of Kabbalistic and geographical truth. When God returns Zion to its place—above the Gihon Spring on the lower slope of Mount Moriah—Foundation (Yesod) and Kingdom (Malchut) will occupy the identical physical coordinates, and the Shechinah will descend fully.

6. Maimonides and the Immutable Altar: Reaffirming Kabbalistic and Textual Precision

Maimonides rules in Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 2:1: “The altar is [to be constructed] in a very precise location, which may never be changed, as it is said: ‘This is the altar for the burnt-offerings of Israel.’ This ruling ties Akedah to the incident that caused King David to build an altar at the foot of the Angel of Death that was standing on a threshing floor on the summit of Mount Moriah. Crucially, well before King David, Tanach makes it clear the site of the Akedah altar was a specific, pre-existing altar, not a threshing floor and no apparent association with Zion or Yireh-Salem.

7. The “Temple Zero” Candidate: Archaeological Corroboration of the Original Zion Site

Eli Shukron’s excavations on the eastern slope of the City of David, directly above the Gihon Spring, have uncovered an exceptional eight-room rock-hewn ritual complex dating to the Middle Bronze Age/Melchizedek era. The structure features an altar platform installation, a standing stone (massebah), oil press, and libation channels, clear evidence of sustained cultic/religious practice. It was first exposed and deliberately sealed with fill in the 8th century BCE, aligning precisely with King Uzziah and ultimately Hezekiah’s centralization reforms that abolished outlying ritual sites. Shukron, the excavation director, described it as the only known structure of its type from the biblical period in Jerusalem, used by Judahites. Informally termed “Temple Zero,” its location matches exactly the coordinates of the “stronghold of Zion,” the Joshua tribal boundaries (En Shemesh/En Rogel, southern slope of the Jebusite city), the tzinor water channel, and the lower slope above En Shemesh. This is the physical footprint of the primordial Yesod—the original Zion that served as the psycho-spiritual anchor before the Davidic shift and summit substitution. No comparable Iron-Age cultic installation exists elsewhere on the ridge. “Temple Zero” stands as the archaeological candidate that fulfills every textual, mystical, and geo-physical criterion.

Conclusion

The evidence converges with irrefutable force. Because Kabbalistic philosophy precedes and illuminates all of Tanach, the physical location of Zion cannot be a flexible label that permanently migrated to the summit. It is a fixed psycho-spiritual and geographical reality awaiting divine restoration. When God returns Zion—above the Gihon Spring on the lower slope of Mount Moriah, at the precise site now corroborated by “Temple Zero”—Foundation (Yesod) and Kingdom (Malchut) will occupy the identical physical coordinates. The Shechinah will descend fully, and Messianic reality will be complete. Mainstream tradition’s identification of the Temple Mount platform as Zion’s eternal home rests on the post-Davidic shift and later expansion, not the primal Kabbalistic, prophetic, tribal, legal, and textual record preserved in the original proof.

The Zohar, prophets, Davidic narratives, tribal borders, Maimonides’ precision, Isaiah’s grammar, and Shukron’s Temple Zero constitute decisive proof: the original Zion has never been lost—only temporarily obscured. Its return is imminent.

When God Returns Zion To Its Place!

Zohar (Beshalach 2:55b) teaches that Zion is the psycho-spiritual attribute of Foundation, the Yesod that in reality is activated by separating the inner 'periya' of the Jewish circumcision from the outer 'orla' representing Malchut, Kingdom, Jerusalem, then by folding them over, together they manifest Jewish covenantal reality. The Book of Creation, Sefer Yetzirah relates these to the covenant of holy tongue, language and its use of Hebrew's holy letters, that aspire for pure speech.

The Kedushat Levi explains that this type of "speaking" (speech) was expressed by Joseph The Righteous, Yosef Hatzadik refusal to "suckle" from impure sources (a reference to his struggle in Egypt). The letters of Josef and Zion share the same numerical value or gematria '156' both represent Yesod, the organ of Israel's covenant which Yosef guarded and maintained in purity avoiding foreign, impure influences (both physical and spiritual).

The Lesson: Rav Levi Yitzchak teaches that the mouth, that is destined to "speak to the Shechinah" (Divine Presence) must be guarded against impurity, just as Yosef guarded himself in Egypt.

By following the laws of kashrut as stated in Shemini, Jews sanctify their mouths to ensure they are worthy of connection to God, mirroring Yosef’s righteousness. Immediately prior, also, in Shemini, Nadav and Avihu died brining a foreign fire into the Holy of Holies and later, from Balak the midrash and Zohar describe how their souls were converged into Pinchas who uniquely became elevated to the Priesthood as a Kohen and who was ultimately reincarnated and became The Prophet Eliyahu Tishbi.

Every Passover Jews pour a cup of wine then walk it to their front doors where they call outside for Eliyahu's return, which is thought to be the event that precedes Messianic return (Moshiach). The same Eliyahu is welcomed at every Jewish Circumcision, The Covenant, who comes to spiritually observe the separation of periya and orla of every brit milah.

This perpetual Jewish ritual connecting covenant with speech, Zion with Joseph manifests in the future King David Messianic reality when Eliyahu returns to tell about the imminent realization of Moshiach in the world. This is the time that Zion will be fully revealed and the Shechina, representing God's presence, is restored as the prevailing and dominant feature manifest in reality.

The prophet Isaiah, Yeshayahu states; בשוב ה״ ציון" (52:8)" which literally means "God will return Zion". Commentators debate comparative translations of similar verses, but all other grammar relating to this return include prefix or suffix letters that indicate God will return. However, here God will return Zion, which we can comprehend in the lofty psycho-spiritual realm, but we must also understand it in reality. 

Zion is mentioned first in 2 Samuel 5:7–9 which says: “David captured the stronghold of Zion and renamed it City of David…Whoever would strike the Jebusites, let him go up the water channel (TZiNoR).” The site is the “stronghold of Zion” captured via the water channel.

"Stronghold of Zion" could mean adjacent (nearby) or surrounding Zion, but close in proximity. So, we are left to ponder whether David ever located the physical Zion that the stronghold protected or what may have happened to it?

When David captured the "stronghold of Zion", the Jebusite village was a settlement on the upper ridge on the lower (southern) slope of Mount Moriah immediately above, in line with the spring of En Shemesh, first mentioned in Joshua 15:7 a few hundred years prior. 

However, II_Samuel.5.9 tells us the stronghold was renamed City of David, later 1 Kings 8:1 says the City of David is Zion and much later Isaiah 52.8 says God will return Zion

King David had been anointed seven years prior to his arrival at the Stronghold, so what compelled him to come to this Mount Moriah location, conquer the stronghold and invoke the name Zion? 

As we have already discussed, the ancient psycho-spiritual-reality converging Zion and Jerusalem was already entrenched in indigenous tribal Israelite culture. The name Salem emanated at Abraham tithing Malchi-Tzedek, the High Priest of Salem and later at the binding of Isaac Abraham added the name Yireh to the same site together constituting Yireh-Salem: Jerusalem.

On Davids arrival at the mountain, his coining the word "Zion" declared it as the integral objective of his mission. But, the stronghold was a lesser substitute for a Zion that was not ready to be returned. Instead the City of David became its substitute. Once the first temple had been built Zion began to drift from its anchor and its location on Mount Moriah shifted from the original location by which Jerusalem had once obtained its name.

After the events that established Yireh-Salem Tanach reserved the definite article “HaMakom” (“The Place”) for its Moriah location, which permanently identified it as the altar of Isaac's binding -  Akedah. But, almost 1000 years later, King David made a surprise announcement: “This is the altar for the burnt-offerings of Israel”, it broke the chain and shifted Zion to the mountain summit “on Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to David his father, at the place that David had appointed, on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.”

Jewish Law and Tradition establish Zion, the inner Foundation and Jerusalem, the outer Kingdom by absolute precision, fixed by Divine designation, tribal boundaries, and physical features that can be verified against text. They are in fact not only places reserved for the psycho-spiritual-realm, their convergence must also, both occupy the same place in the physical realm and when they do, "God will return Zion" to its place! 

Maimonides rules in Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 2:1: “The altar is [to be constructed] in a very precise location, which may never be changed, as it is said: ‘This is the altar for the burnt-offerings of Israel.' This ruling ties Akedah to the incident that caused King David to build an altar at the foot of the Angel of Death that was standing on a threshing floor on the summit of Mount Moriah. Crucially, well before King David, Tanach makes it clear the site of the Akedah altar was a specific, pre-existing altar, not a threshing floor and no apparent association with Zion or Yireh-Salem. 

Walking up to the site of Akeda or the threshing floor can only ever, geo-physically, be made by approaching from the south or east in order to preserve a sense of psycho-spiritual rising up or elevation known as 'aliya-la-regel'. Some 300 years before King David, Joshua’s tribal boundaries fixed Benjamins Southeast corner on the adjacent northern border of tribe Judah. Benjamin was Joseph's brother and as such is also represented by the lower aspect of Foundation - Yesod and that is precisely where the psycho-spiritual connection between Foundation and Kingdom manifests. It is through Benjamin that the connection between David and Joseph becomes permanent.

Joshua 15:7 The boundary ascended from the Valley of Achor to Debir and turned north to Gilgal, facing the Ascent of Adummim that is south of the wadi; from there the boundary continued to the Waters of En-shemesh and ran on to En-rogel.

Joshua 15:8 (Judah’s northern border): “The boundary went up the Valley of the Son of Hinnom to the southern slope of the Jebusite city, that is Jerusalem and climbed to the crest of the mountain west of the Hinnom Valley at its northern end, at the Valley of Rephaim.”

Joshua 18:16 (Benjamin’s southern border): “The border went down to the foot of the mountain that lies before the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, which is in the Valley of Rephaim on the north; it continued down the Valley of Hinnom to the slope of the Jebusite on the south, and descended to En Rogel.”

These verses place the boundary at the southern slope of the Jebusite city (Jerusalem), the Valley of Hinnom, and En Rogel—the exact area of the Gihon Spring (also called En Shemesh) and the eastern slope of Mount Moriah.

The Gemara (*Zevachim* 53b) explicitly adopts these Joshua boundaries, albeit to explain the second temple altar design: “What is the reason that there was no base on the southeast corner of the altar? … Because it was not in the portion of land of the one who tears, i.e., the tribe of Benjamin … The part of the altar in Judah’s portion was the southeast corner of the base, and therefore there was no base on that corner.” 

On the eastern slope of Mount Moriah, directly above the Gihon Spring (En Shemesh) in the City of David, a rock-cut altar platform, carved from bedrock was discovered along with other significant features in a Stone Temple complex. These features align with the texts:

- Bedrock walls enclose the north, west, and south sides; the southeast corner is open—precisely as required by the Joshua boundaries and *Zevachim* 53b.

- It lies adjacent to the ancient TZiNoR water channel between En Shemesh and En Rogel described in 2 Samuel 5:8 and Joshua 18:16.

- Its location on the Judah-Benjamin border fulfills the tribal division codified in Joshua 15 and 18, with the southeast corner intersecting the boundary exactly as mapped in the excavations.

No other site on Mount Moriah combines these elements: the Joshua-defined border coordinates, the TZiNoR water channel, the open southeast corner, the bedrock foundation demanded by Halacha, and the pre-existing “ha-mizbeach” altar identified by Chizkuni.

When Zion and Jerusalem align in the psycho-spiritual and physical realm Joseph's higher Foundation will unite with Benjamin, then Zion will be returned and Kingdom in Jerusalem will rise again, forever!

Archaeology on Mount Moriah At Time of Biblical Jacob!

In his latest paper lead archaeologist Filip Vukosavović described work on the eastern slope of Jerusalem's Mount Moriah stating the; "discovery also offers conclusive evidence that the Fortified Passage and the Mid-Slope Fortification never functioned together." It’s a key observation that distinguishes Middle Bronze Age (MBA) from Iron Age (IA) archaeology. But, whether the Fortified Passage ever functioned together with the Mid-Slope, Rock-Cut-Rooms (RCR) during the MBA or whether the rooms had already disappeared under earth and were entirely lost at the time of construction and beyond was unknown. It’s important  because it would reveal if Kings from David and later were ever aware of RCR? 

Think about this: Sometime toward the end of the MBA, around 1500-1200 BCE a ruler over Mount Moriah's residents requested assistance to construct of the Fortified Passage on its open eastern face leading to the spring. This was no ordinary construction. Most of the boulders in the Fortified Passage weigh ~2–3 tons, large blocks ~5–8 tons and largest blocks ~8–10 tons, therefore, for several years a significant external labor force would have been present quarrying and moving blocks 10-40 meters up the steep ~20 degree slope. Hillel Geva among other notable archaeologists proposed that the number of inhabitants in Jerusalem in the Middle Bronze Age was at most 500–700. Allied forces were required to provide the labor to undertake such a significant construction.

On the Mid-Slope, at the top of the Fortified Passage construction site, a few meters south, organic material lay undisturbed in an ash layer, just above the bedrock. Adjacent to this ash layer a dormant water channel filled with 17th century BCE earth. 5-10 cm above the flat bedrock in a thin 1-cm horizontal layer of ash that was suspended on top of soft earth, archaeologists in 2016 found sample RTD-9962 that was covered over by collapsed medium size stones and RTD-9181 trapped beneath a floor of an IA building (W15048). The ash layer horizon could be traced for around 2m and the samples dated it between 1605 and 1515 BCE with a higher likelihood at the lower end of the range 1545 BCE - 1515 BCE. 

These findings confirmed that neither MBA constructors of the Fortified Passage or any other person since had ever disturbed this delicate ash layer. Therefore, the 2m wide area around these samples was fully preserved during MBA until their discovery in 2016. Further, organic samples above and below plaster lining the bedrock water channel were dated similarly by Weizmann and Cambridge indicating that it and the surrounding area were never used to support the activities of the RCR, implying that the rooms went entirely out of use. 

Now we can definitively say the MBA Fortified Passage never connected the MBA RCR on the same Mid-Slope even though it was later shared with IA Fortifications (see map W20005 below). That means the RCR went out of use for around 800 years until the IA Fortifications were constructed on the Mid-Slope at which stage the RCR were discovered and promptly reburied and remained buried until the Montague Parker excavation in the early 1900's stumbled across one of the rooms and Eli Shukron uncovered the rest in 2010.  

Notwithstanding that the RCR's were exposed to IA constructors of wall W20005 we validate that dating the area spanning the water channel and ash layer samples over the RCR's, to the east, and down the slope was entirely open: On the slope down to the spring (east of RCR) samples in the mortar of a wall segment sample were dated to the same dates as those in the ash layer (1605-1510 BCE). Therefore, shortly after this wall segment was constructed the entire area of the RCR's went out of use and the samples covered in this article lay in-situ, untouched for the past 3500 years. 

With this in mind, we can now comprehend how, according to Codex Judaica, the most statistically correct and well established Bible chronology, the events that overlap these sampled dates could conceivably coincide with Biblical Jacob.

Redeeming Zion!

The Temple Mount features deeply in the psyche of many religious Jews that they are often blinded to misinterpret the location of Zion. Here I have extracted the most revealing mentions of Zion and I elaborate their meaning in that context.  

2 Samuel 5:7 

וַיִּלְכֹּ֣ד דָּוִ֔ד אֵ֖ת מְצֻדַ֣ת צִיּ֑וֹן הִ֖יא עִ֥יר דָּוִֽד׃

But David captured the stronghold of Zion; it is now the City of David.

Prophet Samuel tells us the citadel or stronghold of Zion becomes the City of David. The verses tell us David stayed in the place they captured and that place that he stayed was expanded and became the City of David.

Timeline of Jacob at Jerusalem's Stone Temple

Biblical events and archaeology, on the eastern slope of Mount Moriah are complex.  Here, I constructed this dual timeline, from creation with Gregorian dating.

According to Biblical chronology Jacob's first encounter on Mount Moriah took place in 1573 BCE. Twenty two years later, in 1551 BCE, he returned with his family to Mount Moriah. Some 30 years later Jacob immigrated to Egypt, where his descendants remained for 250 years before they returned to their ancestral land.

The overlapping 10 year construction and use of the water channel (1545-1535 BCE) within the 30 year time of Jacob makes this discovery remarkable particularly because of its exciting context with the rock-cut-temple and matzevah, stone pillar found within the stone temple location. According to the Bible Jacob erected a matzevah at this location (Genesis 35:14). See video explainer.

Part One
Biblical Dating

Part Two
Archaeology

The video weaves the time bound elements of this remarkable discovery at the City of David, Jerusalem.

Yes, Gaza Is Aza - End The 4000 Year Curse.

All Jews must prepare for a Holy war that lasts beyond evil Jihad. After Israel bombs more buildings, completes its ground invasion, kills lots of terrorists, rescues as many hostages as it can, buries and grieves its dead, we must ensure it corrects the 4000 year old curse of Aza by immediately securing land and possessing it in Gaza.

This curse relates to Abraham and Isaacs pact with the King of Philistines who attacked their wells, then demanded concessions for peace. Sound familiar? They granted him and his future generations the right to live on the land of Aza.

[Think tribal]: On Israel's return to its land, the tribe of Dan were allotted land that included Aza. The other 11 tribes of Israel, had already settled their land but, they failed to assist Dan conquer its allotment. Disenfranchised and demotivated, Dan's tribal leaders wandered aimlessly often promoting idolatry to other tribes. Then, Samson became a leader of Dan and the nations highest judge. Single handedly he attempted to draw attention to the problem. He went to Aza, ripped the iron gates off the city walls and carried them to the graves of Israel's Patriarchs and Matriarchs in Hebron. Sadly no tribe stepped up to help the tribe of Dan. 

Samson belittled the powerful Philistines until he destroyed their temple of idolatry perishing with their leaders and thousands of congregants. Later, the Philistines raided all of Israel's tribes and stole the nations most holy possession, the Ark of Covenant, from their temple, in Shilo. The peace-pact was shattered a thousand years after Abraham and Isaac. But, Dan and Israel were dispossessed of their land and never returned to Aza. 

Yes, Aza is Gaza. Resurrecting that pact, the Romans named all of Israel Syria Palestina, and the British adopted the Roman resurrection calling it Palestine. On Simchat Torah 5784, of the Hebrew Year, Israel paid a very heavy price. Now, it must break the enemy curse and finally possess Aza. 

ISRAEL MUST NEVER LEAVE GAZA! 

There, Israel must immediately build a Hesder Yeshiva and protect it with everything it’s got. Then, build another and another and another…until holy places of Jewish Torah learning and their communities are secured in all of Gaza. This is how Aza's neighborhoods can begin to be normalized. The plan has been implemented and is working for resilient Jewish communities in The City of David, Silwan, Nazareth elit, Bat Yam, Lud, Jabel MuKabar, Hebron and many other places in Israel. 

Holy Torah is the only weapon Israel has to dispel and resist any misconstrued, Jihad! Israel must not fall into the trap of building fences around empty tracts of land on which Palestinians can be recruited by the next Jihadist terror regime. That would be an invitation for the next disastrous tragedy in years or decades to come. Never again!

Humble Expectations On Jerusalem's Mount Moriah

In his quest for meaning Rabbi Jonathan Sacks z'l speaks:

Now, I want to ask you a simple question. King Solomon built a Temple. Is that a good thing or not? Well, it must have been a good thing. It was the greatest thing ever, right? But were there some downsides to it? Were there some downsides to building the Temple? Okay, have a look at the beginning of the story of the building of the Temple. Can you see what it says? [I Kings 5:27-30]

King Solomon conscripted labourers from all Israel, 30,000 men. He sent them off to Lebanon in shifts of 10,000 a month. So they spent one month in Lebanon, two months at home... Solomon had 70,000 carriers and 80,000 stonecutters in the hills, as well as 3,300 foreman who supervised... How many people did he have building the Temple? Can you do your arithmetic? (Congregation member speaks) A lot, exactly so. Precisely so, 183,000 and some, okay? That remind you of anything? When was the last time you heard about the Israelites being turned into a labour force? (Congregation member speaks - Egypt) Correct. Hang on, we were supposed to leave Egypt, right? Solomon seems to have taken the people back into slavery.

Now, have a look here at [I Kings 9:20-23]. All the people who were left of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, the Jebusites who were not of the people of Israel, these Solomon drafted to be slaves, and so they are to this day. But the people of Israel Solomon made no slaves. Can you read that? The Torah has to tell us, King Solomon didn't make the Israelites slaves. That's quite striking, is it not? Tell me, how long did it take Solomon to build the Temple? Anyone know?

Have a look, [I Kings 6:37-38]. In the fourth year the foundation of the House of the Lord was laid, in the month of Ziv. And in the 11th year, in the month of Bul, which is the eighth month, the house was finished in all its parts, according to all its specifications. He was seven years in building it. It took him seven years to build the Temple, okay? Now look at the very next verse in Tanach. Can you see it?

[I Kings 7:1] Solomon was building his own house for thirteen years. Is that telling you something? He spent almost twice as long building his own palace as he spent building a House for God. So the Temple was a wonderful, wonderful thing, the greatest thing ever, but it practically reduced the whole of the Israelites to slavery. So that the Torah has to tell us, well he didn't actually make them into slaves, because at the end of seven years they could go free. And he spent twice as long building a house for himself as he spent building a House for God. That is a bit of a critique, right?

Now, do you remember what God said to David, when David said, "I've got to build a Temple for God." Anyone know what God said? Have a look, David says to the Prophet Nathan, "I want to build a house for God." Nathan says, that's a great idea, go ahead and do it. But, then we read... [II Samuel 7:4-7] But that night the word of the Lord came to Nathan, Go and tell my servant David, ‘Thus says the Lord, would you build Me a house to dwell in? I haven't lived in a house since the day I brought up the people of Egypt to this day. I've been moving about in a Tent for My dwelling. In all the places I've moved with the people of Israel, did I speak a word about any of the Judges of Israel, whom I commanded to shepherd My people, saying, "Why haven't you built Me a house of cedar?"

I don't want a House. I'm happy with a Tent. So, we see that there is an undercurrent here. It's not the primary meaning, the Beit HaMikdash was the holiest thing ever, but there's an undercurrent that God didn't want this kind of palace. That it would turn the Israelites into a corvée, a nation of slave labourers. That it would be like every other nation in the ancient world, the modern world and everything in between. You want to announce, I'm great? You build monumental buildings. Everyone did it. Every, single nation there ever was. And God is saying to David, do you think I'm like that? Did I ever ask for such a thing? I was happy with a Tent. What was the name of that tent, by the way? It was called the Mishkan. Incidentally, how do English Bibles translate the word “Mishkan”. Anyone know? (congregation member answers: Tabernacle) “Tabernacle”. Does that remind you of something. (congregation members: Succot – the Festival of Tabernacles - Succah's) Are you with me? So, as house is to succah, so mikdash is to Mishkan as Temple is to Tabernacle. Right?

Now, I asked you a simple question. Who lived in a succah in the Torah? The Israelites, never! But what is the root of the word succah? Anyone know? What do we call the roof of a succah? S’chach. The root of succah is s’chach. Does that word appear anywhere in the Torah? The answer is yes, it appears twice. In which context, does anyone know? In the Mishkan, right?

There it is [Shemot 25:20-22] Vehayu hakeruvim, The cherubs, above the Aron [the Ark] right? The cherubs, porsay chnafayim lemalah, they spread their hands over them, sochechim bechanfayhem al-hakaporet. They comfort him. They were overshadowing, they were protecting, they were shadowing the kaporet. Al hakaporet uf’nayhem ish el-achiv el hakaporet. And the cherubs were facing one another. And that is in parshat Terumah, in which we have the command to build the Mishkan and the same words appear in parshat Vayakhel when they actually made the succah.

The only context in which s’chach appears in the Torah is in relation to the Mishkan, the tent. There is a place where, I'm not sure if it's the Temple, I'm not sure if it's the Temple, none of the commentators are sure it's the Temple, but does anyone know what harachamon we say in benching (grace after meals) on Chol HaMoed Succot? (congregation members answer) Harachamon hu yakim lanu et succat David Hannofalet. Right. You will see that that is a quote from Amos. [Amos 9:11] Bayom hahu akim et-succat David hanofellet. I will restore the succah of David that has fallen down. And remember what God said to David. I prefer living in a tent than a palace, than a House of cedar.

Now I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Which of the patriarchs lived in a house? Did Abraham live in a house? No, he lived in a tent. Did Isaac live in a house? No, he lived in a tent. You know who lived in houses? Have a look. Two angels come to Lot in Sodom. [Bereishit 19:2] Vayomer hineh na-adonay suru na el-bat avadechem... Lot lives in a house. Abraham lives in a tent. You know who else lives in a house? Look at source 28. [Bereishit 24:23] Vayomer bat-mi at hagidi na li hayesh beit avich makom lanu lalin. Abraham’s servant has come to find a wife for Isaac, who lives in a house? Laban lives in a house, Lot lives in house. Is that a good advertisement for a house? Not really, okay? Abraham lives in a tent, Isaac lives in a tent. Who is the first patriarch who lives in a house? Here is the verse, can you see it?

Now, listen, this has to be one of the strangest verses in the whole Torah. Listen carefully, [Bereishit 33:17] VaYaacov nassa succotah, and Jacob travelled to Succot, vayiven lo bayit, and he made for himself a house, the first patriarch to make for himself a house, ulemiknayhu assah succot, but for his cattle, he made succot. And he is about to celebrate the fact that he's the first patriarch to build a house. What do you think he's going to call the place? Beit something or other, right? Beit-El? Beit-Lechem? You name it. What does he call the place? Al kain kara shem hamakim Succot! Succot! There you are, you just bought a house in Hampstead Garden and you name it after your garage. I mean, have you ever seen anything more extraordinary? And what is Jacob telling us, the whole time? Jews don't have to live in houses to feel secure. I'm happy to live in succot, my animals live in succot, I'm happy to live there.

What does God say in parshas Behar? When you come to the land, the Land, you will never own it in perpetuity. Why? Ki li ha’aretz ki geirim vetoshavim atem imadi [Vayikra 25:23] “You are mere strangers and temporary residents, as far as I'm concerned.”

In other words, even though you live safely in the Land of Israel, never forget where you came from. Never settle down that you become complacent. Veram veshavevcha veshachachta, So that your heart is upraised and you forget where you came from and who you owe this to. Never forget. In the immortal words of the Beatles’ last recording, get back to where you once belonged.

So just as, in Israel, they were supposed to remember the forty years of wandering in the desert, now you begin to see this extraordinary thing, that just as, even though they are worshipping in the Temple Solomon built, don't forget how you first once had God living in your midst, in a succah, called the Mishkan, called the Tabernacle. You do not need great buildings of cedar and stone to find God. You can live in a little Mishkan or a portacabin, courtesy of Ikea, I have to tell you. And still God will be there. If, of course, you're keruvim [cherubs] whose face was ish el re’eihu. You turn face to face to your human being. That is where the Shechinah, the presssence of God lives. You remember where the Keruvim were facing in Solomon's Temple? They were not facing one another, they were facing peneihem el haBayit. They were facing the House, they were not looking at each other.

The Gemara in Bava Batra, [daf 99a] says, when Israel do the will of God, the cherubs face each other. When they don't do the will of God, they face the Bayit (House). That is an extraordinary Gemara. It's telling us that the Mishkan was closer to what Hashem wanted than Solomon's Temple. And what Succot is telling us is: Succot is when the Israelites went to the Temple and celebrated the produce of the fields and they thanked HaKadosh Baruch Hu, but they never forgot where they came from. Because every time a nation forgets its youth, its childhood, the hard times they had when they were struggling to make a go, they become decadent and they eventually decline and fall. But Jews never are allowed to do that because it's enough that you’re gerim and toshavim, that you’re temporary residence, and you're always asking Me [i.e. God] for another year of life. And it's enough, don't think you've got a great, big Temple, as good as the Egyptians, and the Mesopotamians. I tell you, I'm good enough with a Mishkan. Because that is the succah, that's the s’chach, that memory of the Mishkan is good enough for Me.

And we now understand exactly the argument of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Eliezer. What is a succah? Rabbi Akiva is right. A succah was a succah mamash. Not a hut the Israelites lived in but the Mishkan, the portable, temporary dwelling that God dwelled in. And Rabbi Eliezer was right when he said annanei kavod. Because where were the annanei kavod? (Congregation member answers) Do you think they covered the people? If you look in the Torah, you will see they covered the Mishkan.

As long as they were in camp, the Cloud was over the Mishkan. When it moved beyond the Mishkan, then it was time to travel on. The Mishkan was a temporary dwelling.

But the odd thing is that the Temple was a permanent dwelling and yet it was destroyed twice, and we don't have it anymore. But the Mishkan, which could move anywhere, because God is everywhere, became the symbol of the shul that you can build in Jerusalem, but also, not bad, in Hampstead Garden Suburb. That became the permanent symbol. The temporary became permanent and the permanent turned out only to be temporary.

Ki besuccot hoshavti et Bnei Yisrael - when I brought them out of Egypt [Vayikra 23:42] It wasn't the Israelites who lived in a succah, it was God who lived in a succah. And the succah is telling us something absolutely unbelievable. That you don't need to have megabucks to buy a home for God. All you need is a garden shed and a bit of faith. And you have your schach and they overshadow you the way the cherubs overshadowed the Ark. And between the Keruvim is the Clouds of Glory.

The simplest, poorest Jew, who turns his face to his brother or sister, and builds a little succah is bathed in Clouds of Glory. And he has built his own, private equivalent of the Mishkan.

Water, Water Everywhere, Will Archaeologists Drink?

The water channel behind rock-cut-rooms
was dated 600 years before King David

On the eastern slopes of Mount Moriah in the City of David, a Middle Bronze Age water system included remnants of a reservoir and a water channel that was carbon dated to 1535 BCE. No other evidence of water supply to rooms of the rock-cut-temple was found, yet despite this some archaeologists still insist that the rock-cut-temple should instead be dated to the Iron Age. 

The evolution of Mount Moriah 

Over simplification and context myopia, distorts academic understanding at this complex, ancient location. However, the video below offers a comprehensive contextual explanation. Before viewing, it's important to illustrate the passage of water as it once flowed to the rooms, more than 3500 years ago  during the Middle Bronze Age (follow the Area U/C map below). 

Room 2 (with tethered animal for slaughter) 

Room 1 (with impression of sacrificial altar on platform)

Water passage. Room 2 (center-foreground)
 Room 1 (upper right-background)

 

Area U water system leading to
 Area C rooms (1 and 2) also in next image

The video explains that the rock-cut-temple was active up until 1500 BCE (Middle Bronze), then buried, out of site until 700 BCE (Iron), exposed at that time, reburied during wall construction and finally excavated 13 years ago. From this Middle Bronze period through the early Iron Age there is an absence of evidence at this installation. 

The next video explains more about the archaeological detail relative to the context of the temple that existed 700 years before the Temple of Solomon on Mount Moriah and why King David never discovered it. 

Jerusalem and Jacob - Calling Archaeology Detectives

Fifty years and tens of millions of dollars have failed to explain 700 years of missing evidence from ancient Jerusalem's eastern slope, at the City of David. The gap perpetuates confusion among archaeologists, who otherwise would prefer to date the significant rock-cut-temple to the Iron Age. You see, between the Middle Bronze (3500 years ago) and Iron Age (2800 years ago) no direct evidence, in the rock-cut-temple, has been discovered and that presents a problem. 

Rock-cut-temple on eastern slope after ground cover was finally cleared in 2023.
The adjacent house, which was built 20 years ago, on compressed ground cover, is now suspended on steel plates with pilons to bedrock

Around the rock-cut-temple, there is undisputed, carbon dated evidence of occupation and Middle Bronze Age use up until 3500 years ago, then +700 years of nothing, and plenty Iron Age evidence after that. The dearth of Iron Age evidence, starting around 2800 years ago, dominates academic papers and influences narratives about the significant rock-cut-temple, yet this evidence gap, that screams the loudest, is ignored by archaeologists. In this case the absence of evidence proves the evidence!

If not for two samples (#9964/5) of organic matter, trapped below and above plaster layers of a man made channel that once fed water into at least the southern-most rock-cut-room, archaeologists would have a more simplified proof of Iron Age origins.

Sample #9964 lay undisturbed, protected by natural ground cover, above the plaster channel for 3500 years. Sample #9965 was protected by the plaster layers of the channel above it. 

At blue line B (map below) the U (Sample #9964) and X (Sample #9965)

"B" marks the excavation site of organic samples, from above and below the plastered water channel.
Other samples #9181/9962 (top) and building 1948 (right) dated between 1820-1510 BCE. 

Water channel flowed from a reservoir to the bedrock floor.
No evidence of an Iron Age water channel and reservoir has been located 

The barrage of published Iron Age evidence and the inferred dating of the rock-cut-temple is refuted by carbon dated samples at several locations. However, most powerful are #9964 and #9965 two 3500 year old, Middle Bronze Age, organic samples that date the water channel construction and last use. Similar plaster layers, on the bedrock, in the western, rear end of a storage room, present insufficient proof of Iron Age shaping of bed rock. Such plaster remnants, dated to the Iron Age, may have been laid by Iron Age occupiers of the homes constructed above the bedrock.

A solution is not easily forthcoming because absence of evidence is an insufficient academic standard of proof. The water channel remains the strongest proof of use and there is no other evidence of water service to the temple. Unfortunately, +700 years after the water channel was last used, in preparation for construction of the City's eastern defensive wall, the rock-cut-temple was cleared to the bedrock to accommodate the 4 meter wide wall. Immediately west, the water channel was recently traced, running, from the remains of a reservoir (at blue B), underneath Iron Age homes to the southernmost rock-cut-room. However, archaeologists won't confirm that the channels Middle Bronze Age construction is directly linked to construction of the rock-cut-temple. Instead, they promote an alternative, unproven, theory that the water channel was cut (at blue B) by constructors and at the southern rock-cut-room during its Iron Age construction. This hypothesis only exacerbates the absence of an Iron Age water system.

Clearance of the area by Iron Age wall constructors, remains the best explanation for the absence of direct evidence, but what, if any direct evidence, was cleared from the bedrock at that time remains a mystery and whether the rock-cut-temple had been buried under ground cover, for +700 years, before the wall constructors cleared it, remains inconclusive. 

Any suggestion that #9964, and other samples #9181 and #9962 survived, in situ, above ground, for +700 years, while Iron Age Area U and rock-cut-temple was apparently constructed, exposed or in active use is preposterous. More likely the last use of the rock-cut-rooms is also tied to the date of sample #9964 and construction of the rock-cut-rooms dated to sample #9965 sometime between 1615 BCE and 1880 BCE or prior.

Accumulated ground cover concealing the rock-cut-temple site as it was in 2012.
Adjacent house built on compressed ground cover.

Promotion of an academic theory for Iron Age construction of the rock-cut-temple is further refuted by surviving evidence immediately north (#9181 and #9962), of sample #9964 (from the water channel) and east, from below building 1948, dated to 1820 BCE and in mortar 1.2m above bedrock dated to 1605 BCE. These additional samples strongly increase the probability of a Middle Bronze Age origin and suggest that a significant Iron Age construction of the rock-cut-temple would have disrupted at least #9181 and #9962 laying bare on the surface of these excavated areas. 

Academia faces significant challenges in admitting a Middle Bronze Age origin because of Iron Age bias in tangential data and the Biblical alignment to the archaeological last use, defined by at least sample #9964. The period of carbon dating overlaps patriarch Jacob who, Jewish commentators attest stayed briefly on Mount Moriah. According to Biblical chronology Jacob's first encounter on Mount Moriah took place in 1573 BCE. Then, he and his family arrived on Mount Moriah in 1553 BCE and left the region in 1523 BCE. Jacob immigrated to Egypt, where his descendants remained for 250 years before they returned to their ancestral land. The overlapping 100 year use of the water channel (1535 BCE) with time of Jacob makes this discovery remarkable particularly because of its potentially exciting context to the  rock-cut-temple and matzevah found within the temple location. According to the Bible Jacob erected a matzevah at this location (Genesis 35:14).

The matzevah, "standing stone" or anointing pillar at the rock-cut-temple.

The video above tells the comprehensive story.

Jerusalem's Temple Zero Underground

Temple Zero Excavation (north end)

Temple Zero Excavation (south end)

More than 500 years before King David Temple Zero, in Ancient Jerusalem's City of David had been constructed, used regularly and completely buried by falling groundcover. Whether King David ever re-discovered Temple Zero, or King Uzziah or Hezekiah were the first to re-discover it is debated here. Recently excavated elements, located on east and west adjacencies of Temple Zero, under virgin soil, in an ash layer above bedrock and a defensive wall prove the hypothesis that King David never discovered it. The discovery presents Temple Zero as a legitimate contender for the altar of the future temple in Jerusalem.

  

Seeds of wheat and barley, in a delicate 2m long, 1cm thick layer of ash, 5cm above bedrock, lay undisturbed from Middle Bronze Age through the Iron Age period of King David until King Uzziah and remained in place until their recent extraction. This delicate ash layer was preserved only because soft dirt had accumulated above it. In the ash, one seed was preserved under the wall of a late Iron Age building the other under collapsed rocks from surrounding Iron Age constructions. These seeds were carbon dated ~3290 years before the present (using 1950 as the reference age) and corelated to Middle Bronze Age archaeology of 1605-1510 BCE. 

Area U in pink (also map below).
Western edge of Temple Zero (greyed) in center of pink border

Water channel (Blue)

Iron Age wall constructors would first probe soft dirt until they discovered underlying bedrock sufficient to support wall construction. Then, they would remove soil and other moveable elements until they located the full length of bedrock necessary to support the wall width and length. On that they built their wall.

The Iron Age buildings were constructed after the wall, along Temple Zero's westernmost edge of Area U (map below) on the elevated edge of its rock-cut-rooms. The bedrock edge drops down the sheer east facing walls, of hollowed bedrock rooms 1.5-2m to the bedrock floor of the Temple Zero complex. Well before the Iron Age, the hollowed out rooms had once been filled with accumulated sand or natural dirt, that fell down the slope burying Temple Zero to a depth of  at least 1.5-2m. 

Red dots mark carbon dated evidence
  Iron Age walls (red) on western edge
of Temple Zero's rock-cut-rooms

Heights above sea level

Less than 10 meters east, further down slope toward the valley, additional evidence was found, between bedrock and leveling rocks supporting a Middle Bronze Age wall (red dots on the image above-right). This indicates earth below the supporting rocks of the walls base had been used 150-200 years before the seeds trapped in the ash layer (further to the west). However, around 1m above the bedrock additional evidence, taken from the walls' mortar, revealed entrapped seeds of a similar date as the ash layer seeds. Therefore, the walls foundation layers were constructed on a base above bedrock more than 150 years earlier, shown in the image below. 

Large rock placed on smaller supporting rocks
near the bedrock base, site of earlier dated evidence

Curiously the study identified an unusual 17th century gap in evidence, indicating that the entire area went out of use during the 50-75 years that preceded the ash layer seeds and the building of this small Middle Bronze Age wall.  

This evidence at the rock-cut-rooms of Temple Zero strongly points to a natural burial, by slippage, wash, wind and accumulation. It is widely known to archaeologists that a location on a steep slope, such as this site, on the east of Mount Moriah would naturally accumulate sufficient dirt to be entirely covered over within 5 years. Complete burial would naturally obfuscate the existence of Temple Zero's rock-cut-rooms.

Since Temple Zero was buried underground sometime in the 17th century it would not have been used for active worship during the 10th century reign of King David because the evidence in the drainage channel was undisturbed. The next time all of Temple Zero's rock-cut-rooms were exposed was during the bedrock discovery phase, required for construction of Jerusalem's massive eastern defensive wall, in the 8th century leading up to or during the reign of King Uzziah. Almost 1000 years after the seeds became trapped in the ash layer, constructors of the massive defensive wall discovered, preserved and re-buried Temple Zero where it remained for another 2600 years until it was recently discovered in 2011.

The implications of this study are important because they provide a credible reason why Temple Zero was never discovered by King David and how the fragile matzevah (Stone of Israel), located in Temple Zero survived in its original place, preserved in soft sand, in tact all these years. One can only imagine what King Uzziah’s Iron Age wall constructors must have thought when they discovered and preserved it for our generation?